On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 01:12:37 +0200 > Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > static ftrace_func_t ftrace_ops_get_list_func(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > > +static ftrace_asm_func_t ftrace_ops_get_list_func(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > > { > > +#if FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC > > + return ftrace_ops_list_func; > > +#else > > /* > > * If this is a dynamic, RCU, or per CPU ops, or we force list func, > > * then it needs to call the list anyway. > > */ > > - if (ops->flags & (FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC | FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU) || > > - FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC) > > + if (ops->flags & (FTRACE_OPS_FL_DYNAMIC | FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU)) > > return ftrace_ops_list_func; > > > > return ftrace_ops_get_func(ops); > > But ftrace_ops_get_func() returns ftrace_func_t type, wont this complain? No, because we only compile this case under FTRACE_FORCE_LIST_FUNC==0, which means ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS, which means the preprocessor turns all occurrences of ftrace_asm_func_t into ftrace_func_t. Essentially my idea here is to take the high-level rule "you can only directly call ftrace_func_t-typed functions from assembly if ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS", and encode it in the type system. And then the compiler won't complain as long as we make sure that we never cast between the two types under ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS==0.