Kees,
Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:26:30AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> I understand how this is supposed to work, but I fail to find an
>> explanation how all of this is preserving the text subsections we have,
>> i.e. .kprobes.text, .entry.text ...?
>
> I had the same question when I first started looking at earlier versions
> of this series! :)
>
>> I assume that the functions in these subsections are reshuffled within
>> their own randomized address space so that __xxx_text_start and
>> __xxx_text_end markers still make sense, right?
>
> No, but perhaps in the future. Right now, they are entirely ignored and
> left untouched.
I'm fine with that restriction, but for a moment I got worried that this
might screw up explicit subsections.
This really want's to be clearly expressed in the cover letter and the
changelogs so that such questions don't arise again.
<SNIP>
> So, before any of that, just .text.* is a good first step, and after
> that I think next would be getting .text randomized relative to the other
> .text.* sections (IIUC, it is entirely untouched currently, so only the
> standard KASLR base offset moves it around). Only after that do we start
> poking around trying to munge the special section contents (which
> requires use solving a few problems simultaneously). :)
Thanks for the detailed explanation!
tglx
