On 4/9/20 3:19 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
>> @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ __ref void *alloc_low_pages(unsigned int num)
>> } else {
>> pfn = pgt_buf_end;
>> pgt_buf_end += num;
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "BRK [%#010lx, %#010lx] PGTABLE\n",
>> - pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (pgt_buf_end << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> --
>> 2.24.1
>>
> This was acked by Kees, is it ok for merge?
Independent of the obvious security implications, I don't think I've
ever once gleaned useful information from that message. It's fine by me.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
