Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] powerpc/kprobes: Mark newly allocated probes as RO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell Currey wrote:
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 00:18 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Russell Currey wrote:
> > With CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y and CONFIG_KPROBES=y, there will
> > be one
> > W+X page at boot by default.  This can be tested with
> > CONFIG_PPC_PTDUMP=y and CONFIG_PPC_DEBUG_WX=y set, and checking
> > the
> > kernel log during boot.
> > > > powerpc doesn't implement its own alloc() for kprobes like other
> > architectures do, but we couldn't immediately mark RO anyway
> > since we do
> > a memcpy to the page we allocate later.  After that, nothing
> > should be
> > allowed to modify the page, and write permissions are removed
> > well
> > before the kprobe is armed.
> > > > The memcpy() would fail if >1 probes were allocated, so use
> > patch_instruction() instead which is safe for RO.
> > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 81efb605113e..fa4502b4de35 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> >  #include <asm/sstep.h>
> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/set_memory.h>
> > +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
> >  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
> > @@ -102,6 +104,16 @@ kprobe_opcode_t *kprobe_lookup_name(const
> > char *name, unsigned int offset)
> >  	return addr;
> >  }
> > > > +void *alloc_insn_page(void)
> > +{
> > +	void *page = vmalloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE);
> > +
> > +	if (page)
> > +		set_memory_ro((unsigned long)page, 1);
> > +
> > +	return page;
> > +}
> > +
> > This crashes for me with KPROBES_SANITY_TEST during the kretprobe > test.
That isn't needed to reproduce this. After bootup, disabling
optprobes also shows the crash with kretprobes:
	sysctl debug.kprobes-optimization=0

The problem happens to be with patch_instruction() in arch_prepare_kprobe(). During boot, on kprobe init, we register a probe on kretprobe_trampoline for use with kretprobes (see arch_init_kprobes()). This results in an instruction slot being allocated, and arch_prepare_kprobe() to be called for copying the instruction (nop) at kretprobe_trampoline. patch_instruction() is failing resulting in corrupt instruction which we try to emulate/single step causing the crash.

OK I think I've fixed it, KPROBES_SANITY_TEST passes too.  I'd
appreciate it if you could test v9, and thanks again for finding this -
very embarrassing bug on my side.

Great! Thanks.

I think I should also add appropriate error checking to kprobes' use of patch_instruction() which would have caught this much more easily.

On a related note, I notice that x86 seems to prefer not having any RWX pages, and so they continue to do 'module_alloc()' followed by 'set_memory_ro()' and then 'set_memory_x()'. Is that something worth following for powerpc?


- Naveen





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux