On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:23PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Commit c54a2744497d ("list: Add hlist_unhashed_lockless()") added a
> "lockless" variant of hlist_unhashed() that uses READ_ONCE() to access
> the 'pprev' pointer of the 'hlist_node', the intention being that this
> could be used by 'timer_pending()' to silence a KCSAN warning. As well
> as forgetting to add the caller, the patch also sprinkles
> {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() invocations over the standard (i.e. non-RCU) hlist
> code, which is undesirable for a number of reasons:
>
> 1. It gives the misleading impression that the non-RCU hlist code is
> in some way lock-free (despite the notable absence of any memory
> barriers!) and silences KCSAN in such cases.
>
> 2. It unnecessarily penalises code generation for non-RCU hlist users
>
> 3. It makes it difficult to introduce list integrity checks because
> of the possibility of concurrent callers.
>
> Retain the {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() invocations for the RCU hlist code, but
> remove them from the non-RCU implementation. Remove the unused
> 'hlist_unhashed_lockless()' function entirely and add the READ_ONCE()
> to hlist_unhashed(), as we do already for hlist_empty() already.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/list.h | 33 ++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
