On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:03:28PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:52:15PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:18:58PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> > > On 28/01/2020 18:49, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > > Filter out CC_FLAGS_SCS and -ffixed-x18 for code that runs at a
> > > > different exception level.
> > >
> > > Hmmm, there are two things being disabled here.
> > >
> > > Stashing the lr in memory pointed to by VA won't work transparently at EL2 ... but
> > > shouldn't KVM's C code still treat x18 as a fixed register?
> >
> > My review of v6 suggested dropping the -ffixed-x18 as well, since it's only
> > introduced by SCS (in patch 5) and so isn't required by anything else. Why
> > do you think it's needed?
>
> When EL1 code calls up to hyp, it expects x18 to be preserved across the
> call, so hyp needs to either preserve it explicitly across a transitions
> from/to EL1 or always preserve it.
I thought we explicitly saved/restored it across the call after
af12376814a5 ("arm64: kvm: stop treating register x18 as caller save"). Is
that not sufficient?
> The latter is easiest since any code used by VHE hyp code will need x18
> saved anyway (ans so any common hyp code needs to).
I would personally prefer to split the VHE and non-VHE code so they can be
compiled with separate options.
Will
