Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:05:35 -0700
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Graf <graf@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@xxxxxxxxx>, kvm list <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Graf <graf@xxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mailing list kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f7f08704-dc4b-c5f8-3889-0fb5957c9c86@intel.com>
Mailing-list: contact kernel-hardening-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:49:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do
> > people still care about x86/32-bit?
> No, not really.

Especially not for KVM, given the number of times 32-bit KVM has been
broken recently without anyone noticing for several kernel releases.

References:
- [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Marius Hillenbrand
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Alexander Graf
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Nadav Amit
- Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
  - From: Dave Hansen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/vsyscall: Change the default vsyscall mode to xonly
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM secrets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]