On May 20, 2019 4:19:28 PM PDT, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Add a new _ASM_MOVABS macro to fetch a symbol address. It will be used >to replace "_ASM_MOV $<symbol>, %dst" code construct that are not >compatible with PIE. > >Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx> >--- > arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h >index 3ff577c0b102..3a686057e882 100644 >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h >@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #define _ASM_ALIGN __ASM_SEL(.balign 4, .balign 8) > > #define _ASM_MOV __ASM_SIZE(mov) >+#define _ASM_MOVABS __ASM_SEL(movl, movabsq) > #define _ASM_INC __ASM_SIZE(inc) > #define _ASM_DEC __ASM_SIZE(dec) > #define _ASM_ADD __ASM_SIZE(add) This is just about *always* wrong on x86-86. We should be using leaq sym(%rip),%reg. If it isn't reachable by leaq, then it is a non-PIE symbol like percpu. You do have to keep those distinct! -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
