It works completly fine for me and has been for years now. dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx pisze: > Long time ago I was using kmail, until it become slow and buggy. > Many would say that Akonadi was too blame. > > Now after years I again try to use kmail again (since Thunderbird > butchered the PGP and its integrated support if it is subpar). > > But kmail again stops working after short while - all emails are in > "Connection Established" state (in config - accounts - receiving). > > Quick googling leads to threads from 5-7 years ago, again pointing at > fault of Akondai. > > Was this a mistake to use Akonadi (or add enough polish to work over > this problems)? > Should someone start kmail3 that actually can be usable? > First of, the error reporting/debugging is not intuitive nor informative.
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Marek Kochanowicz <sirherrbatka@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 06:56:33 +0200
- In-reply-to: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? blame akonadi.
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Martin van Es
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? blame akonadi.
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |