On Thursday, 2013-02-07, Kristian Rink wrote: > Hi; > > and first off, thanks a bunch for your comment, greatly appreciated anyhow. > :) > > Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013, 17:53:24 schrieb Duncan: > > Kristian Rink posted on Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:39:26 +0100 as excerpted: > > > another question related to nepomuk and semantic information: > > Just letting you know the posts are making it and are being seen. > > > > I won't attempt to actually answer these questions as I have kde built > > USE=-semantic-desktop (gentoo), here, disabling the features to the > > extent possible, > > Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm... So hope folks will be forgiving with me asking this > question: Is actually anyone _really_ consciously using nepomuk and the > semantic desktop? No offense, as I like this technology yet so far failed > to really make meaningful use of it. Browsing the web however, it seems > weblogs and web sites are nothing short of bashing nepomuk and outlining > how to disable the "semantic stuff" in order to gain performance. The same > time, KDE applications seem to just partly make use of what nepomuk can > do. Is there any reason for that? I think it is mostly a matter of required work. Most application developers have quite a TODO list themselves and don't necessarily have the time to look into what they could do with a given technology. It might be that it will be new, small and specifically designed applications that take advantage of those capabilities first. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
