On Thursday 15 November 2012 15:41:07 Anne Wilson did opine:
> On 15/11/2012 19:49, Duncan wrote:
> > That was what I was alluding to earlier when I said only you or the
> > list admin (checking the log) could verify that. Now that you've
> > specifically stated that it was sent from the correct address, my
> > theory of some sort of inactive timeout gets stronger.
>
> Except that I've seen no evidence that it exists. I've never seen it
> mentioned in sysadmin conversations, and I've never seen anyone
> question it before this. Sorry, but I don't believe this is the
> answer. Gene could always try a polite question to sysadmin@xxxxxxx
> for them to confirm its existence or otherwise.
>
> Besides, the fact that others can see the messages he says are missing
> suggests that it has nothing to do with the servers.
>
> Anne
To which I'll reply, then why the bounce in the first place? The reason
may in fact be obscure, but it makes the only sense, besides, the bounced
message never did show up in my inbox. At least not yet. 4 or 5 days seems
sufficient for the queue to be flushed.
>
Thanks Ann.
Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up!
Lack of skill dictates economy of style.
-- Joey Ramone
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
