On 08/02/12 16:23, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 02/08/2012 at 05:35, "dE ."<de.techno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually this's a very small bug. You can just type the name with the
extension to solve the problem.
And considering this minor nature, this wont be fixed by the LO team for
years (cause they've much bigger bugs to take care of).
Sorry, but I don't see your point here.
What's the difference if this is minor or huge bug? Bug is a bug, developers
should be aware of it. Since they prioritize bug reports, they will not act
upon each bug immediately, but they should at least know where their software
has rough edges.
And personally, I would rather see this fixed in few years than never.
By the way, as you can see in LO bug tracker (link is in one of previous
posts), they actually did commit change that is supposed to fix that (I did not
had opportunity to see if this fix really works).
Yeah I saw that :-[
Looks like the QT code maintainer is not overloaded with bugs.
Also with this version, have you tried opening docx files?
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
