On Saturday, 2012-03-31, Duncan wrote: > Kevin Krammer posted on Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:53:55 +0200 as excerpted: > > On Saturday, 2012-03-31, Duncan wrote: > >> Chances are if there's not one yet, there might be one on the way. > >> Hopefully there's someone working on a nice, solid, non-akonadified > >> qt-based mail client, too. > > > > http://www.betterinbox.com/ > > Thanks. That's still very new and gmail-only ATM apparently, but it > definitely looks to be worth watching, and I wasn't aware of it yet. So > yes indeed, thanks. =:^) Yeah, they are a pretty new startup and obviously need to prioritze. I was only aware of them because they are users of *and* contributors to email related KDE libraries. Something we will hopefully see more often when the frameworks effort makes individual components more visible as stand-alone entities (which they often already are, just not visible as such). > FWIW, there's also the still fairly new "trojita". Qt4-based, but IMAP- > only, unfortunately, which isn't going to help for users with POP3 (and > webmail, but ugh!) providers only. As I'm in that category... But I'd > be tempted if my providers did IMAP. You could use it with a local IMAP server and use system level agents for mail gathering, e.g. fetchmail. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
