On Sunday 17 April 2011 17:56:53 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2011-04-14, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I suppose we all have our favorite parts of KDE. For me it's Quanta.
> > > For whatever reason the devs at wherever have pretty much decided it
> > > was not worth the effort to bring it along with KDE 4.x. There is one
> > > person trying to bring it along and I hope someday he manages to do
> > > it.
> >
> > No offense, but why at all should Qanta be part of a Desktop Environment?
>
> Good question. Did anyone ever actually suggest that?
>
> > I like Quanta, but what makes it worthwile to integrate it tightly into a
> > DE?
>
> I don't think anyone would attempt that, especially not at this stage of
> development.
>
> > > Kopete is meant to be replaced by telepathy (which is in early
> > > development)
> >
> > So I suppose a KDE frontend will be developed by the KDE project.
> > Which has to be maintained again, same situation but different program.
>
> Not entirely. The shared infrastructure makes it a lot less effort to
> maintain the new program which is basically just user interface.
>
> Basically *the* way to go forward, sharing maintenance load and support of
> new protocols between various development communities.
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin
Am i getting confused here or are you saying Quanta does not warrent
integration yet Kopete or it's replacement does if so that stinks big time ..
Pete .
--
Powered by openSUSE 11.3 (x86_64) Kernel: 2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop
KDE Development Platform: 4.5.5 (KDE 4.5.5) "release 1"
18:20 up 4 days 23:16, 5 users, load average: 0.19, 0.22, 0.18
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
