> In my opinion, the major problem here is not the timing, but rather that
> after putting version 4.N out, focus switches to version 4.N+1 instead
> of focusing 90% on 4.N.1, .2, etc. ÂThis way, a truly nice, stable and
> solid release in never achieved. ÂThe devs always hunt after the next
> big thing, rather than trying to make what they currently have as
> rock-solid as possible :-/ ÂRight now, every release is riddled with
> glitches and annoyances, and instead of focusing on fixing them, new
> features are added for the next major version.
That was basically what I ment with "Features count most",
stability/performance/bug-fixing don't get the attention they deserve.
The question is where to go from here on. As far as I can see things
won't chance for KDE. As a user, I could try Gnome3 but I am afraid it
needs at least a year to mature and I dislike their idea of hiding
"whats behind" from users.
I didn't like xfce years ago, but haven't tried it lately.
Time will show ;)
- Clemens
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
