On Tuesday, 2011-01-18, gene heskett wrote: > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 03:05:56 pm Kevin Krammer did opine: > > [...] > > > > I have not attempted to do this as yet, not knowing how qdbus would > > > react if kmail was not running. I was considering just putting its > > > invocation into the bottom of my rc.local as I know how to do that, > > > and already have several such items fired off that way now. That has > > > been done nbow, but I've not rebooted. > > > > Ah, I missed that option in my other reply. > > Generally a qdbus invocation for a D-Bus name, object path or method > > that does not exist will just fail. > > Apparently silently, or leaves the command in a queue maybe? No queue. If the "recipient" process isn't known to the D-Bus daemon and no .service rule to start it is available, then the call data will just be discarded. > I left it running, but stopped kmail and waited till gkrellm showed > incoming mail, then looked the logs over (I have tails on the important > ones) to any failures and came up empty. The mail was picked up instantly > on restarting kmail, but I believe I have that option set also. So it > appears there is no apparent harm in the early launch I would get from > putting it into rc.local. > > Thanks Kevin. You're welcome :) Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
