On Friday 19 February 2010 13:58:59 Trent Shea wrote: > You should get 'foowobarrd' > Which looks a bit different than the OP... either way, not the expected output :) -- Regards, Trent. ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
Re: static line break persistent bug.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: trent.shea@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: static line break persistent bug.
- From: Trent Shea <trentshea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:04:24 -0700
- Cc: kde@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <201002191358.59582.trentshea@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4B7D6007.8080005@xxxxxxxxx> <201002191034.23324.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201002191358.59582.trentshea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: kde@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trent.shea@xxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.1; KDE/4.3.5; i686; svn-1079084; 2010-01-10)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: static line break persistent bug.
- From: Thomas Olsen
- Re: static line break persistent bug.
- References:
- static line break persistent bug.
- From: paulo
- Re: static line break persistent bug.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: static line break persistent bug.
- From: Trent Shea
- static line break persistent bug.
- Prev by Date: Re: static line break persistent bug.
- Next by Date: Re: static line break persistent bug.
- Previous by thread: Re: static line break persistent bug.
- Next by thread: Re: static line break persistent bug.
- Index(es):
 |