>> So why is it called KDE? Why not another new name?
>> That would be more fair.
>>
> If you have a specific question will try to help you. Please don't waste our
> time with this FUD.
>
Anne, that was not FUD. In fact, it was not even the typical anti-KDE4
rant that usually begins or ends with that question. This time, it was
a legitimate question asked in a refreshingly non-trollish manner.
The truth is, KDE 4 breaks with KDE 3, KDE 2, and KDE [1||0] in many
important aspects, the most important of which is the core philosophy
of the project. KDE =< 3 was all about the users: it had many options
and had many "tricks" to make life easier. The user could customize it
to his exact needs. That was the whole "KDE thing": customization and
usability. KDE 4 breaks with that tradition. I know the reasons why. I
even agree with most of them. However, the simple fact remains that
KDE 4 breaks with the traditional KDE philosophy. Therefore, calling
it "KDE" implies things that KDE 4 does not provide. A different name
would have been wholly appropriate. And suggesting such is _not_
trolling, even though many trolls have done that in the past.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
