Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>
>>> This is no more a "design error" than not being able to get full quality
>>> from resampling a 22kHz sound to 44kHz.
>> I fail to see what re sampling has to do with backward compatibility.
>
> KDE3 = 22 kHz
> KDE4 = needs "true" 44 kHz to function properly
>
>> Failure to consider backward compatibility is, by definition, a design
>> error.
>
> See what Lydia wrote. KDE3 color schemes lack the information to make a
> fully capable KDE4 color scheme (because KDE4 has many more color
> roles). If being able to use KDE3 schemes with full fidelity had been a
> design requirement, we wouldn't be able to move forward.
>
It appears that you missed the point of my previous posting and/or
simply do not understand what I am talking about. This is not about the
fact that KDE4 has more color roles. If KDE4 had taken the schema for
the KDE3 color schemes and _only_ added additional color roles (making
KDE3 color schemes a proper subset of KDE4 color schemes), they we would
have backward compatibility and we could have still moved forward. That
is what backward compatibility is about -- moving forward in an orderly
way by making the new a proper superset of the old.
--
James Tyrer
Linux (mostly) From Scratch
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
