> The way in which bugs are closed on b.k.o. often does not reflect reality;
> isn't there some way to get some kind of new tag which effectively means
> "abandoned"?
>
I would close them as INVALID with an explanation in the last comment.
> Using WONTFIX has a problem: it tells future sufferers "don't bother to
> file this, no matter how important it is to you, because we aren't going to
> fix it". Also, if someone *does* submit the same bug later, it's likely to
> be marked as a dupe without any thought about the fact that the first time
> around WONTFIX didn't mean what it normally means.
>
I have seen WONTFIX such abused, see here:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196307
Does Aaron really intend on not fixing that situation?
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
