In <h0oo9t$inb$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>On 06/10/2009 07:33 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In<880dece00906100243m412d6095nc914f172ec9329dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dotan
>> Cohen wrote:
>>>> Another example of the fact that Plasma doesn't really seem to be part
>>>> of KDE -- something that I totally fail to understand.
>>> What do you mean? Plasma most certainly is part of KDE, in fact it is
>>> one of the basic, most important components of the KDE desktop.
>> Then why doesn't it integrate better by using the global color scheme?
>>
>> This has always irked me as well. Panels and window decorations are the
>> most visible parts of KDE; they should always be using the global color
>> scheme.
>Then how would one go about making nice Plasma themes :D
That's the same excuse everyone uses for not using the global scheme. It
always has been and still is lame.
Either an XGM or a greyscale SVG for each of {NeutralBackground,
AlternateBackground, Normal, Inactive, Active, Link, Visited, Negative,
NeutralText, Positive, Focus, Hover} and composite them at runtime, then
apply a final XGM or greyscale SVG as alpha channel.
You have loads of flexibility while remaining within the parameters
established by the chosen scheme.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
