On Saturday 28 March 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:> This is intentional. Users are generally focused on a task (in the> description) and not a particular application (in the name). This is even> more true of newer users.
Why not give the choice? If I have to be told to do so because someone thinks the majority wants it so, I have Windows or Mac OS X
> It is still ready for the majority of end usersNo. At least that's not what I see when I read my mailing lists.
> , and the KDE project is no > longer supporting KDE 3, so they recommend you upgrade.They don't do it the right way (I mean instead of tempting us to make the move we are being threatened)
> KDE 4.2 still does not appear to have all the features KDE 3.5 had, but it> is a lot better than KDE 3.2. :)
I can't remember 3.2 exactly, but I don't agree, at least when it comes to the desktop (plasma). And, as far as I am concerned, as long as the desktop is not working for me, KDE 4 is not working for me and remains on the test partition
Thierry
-- “Microsoft isn't evil,they just make really crappy operating systems.” Linus Torvald
___________________________________________________This message is from the kde mailing list.Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
