On Sunday 08 March 2009 22:26:45 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Because that way it's easier to work with. As always, the choice that KDE offers is your friend. > I don't even know how to > achieve the layout you proposed in the first place. If you want to do it we can help. > In Thunderbird, I > simply create my account and everything is placed in it's own top-level > group. Yes, that's the way T'bird does it - and has done since the early Netscape days. Personally I don't like it, but as I said before, choice is what matters. > KMail is really trying hard to make me *not* use it. Rubbish. You have choices. You can use T'bird with default settings, but it doesn't have some of the tools that I most appreciate in KMail, such as folder options for controlling mailing list messages, automatic expiry set on a folder-by-folder basis, the ability to set protection flags (and in the latest version the ability to add tags). If they are not important to you, go ahead. However, if iyou want to use KMail, we can give you a loose approximation of the layout you prefer and you keep the advantages of the application. As always, the choice is yours. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
