On Tuesday 2009 January 06 17:20:08 Dotan Cohen wrote: > Thanks for that bit of info. I do know that the release schedules > differ, but Amarok seems like a flagship KDE application. The problem is "KDE application" is a bit ambiguous. Amarok *is* a flagship "KDE application" if by that you mean "an application built using the KDE libraries and frameworks". Amarok is not a "KDE application" if by that you mean "an application maintained and released by the KDE project". Also, "KDE applications" might move between those two, more specific classifications during their lifetime. Plus, I think the KDE project sometimes provide resources to "KDE applications" of the first type, even if they aren't "KDE applications" of the second type. There's even a third type of "KDE application": an application installed automatically by the majority of distributions when you select "KDE" during install. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
