Thierry de Coulon 在 2008 年 10 月 6 日 Monday 03:16:49 時寫道： > Hmm.. Is this a troll? Or have you no idea of computers? > > So, just in case the second option is true: > If you configured "all features of animation" then of course the CPU and > the GPU have a lot more computation to do - so your computer is slower. > > And when you use a higher resolution the "same graphic card" has a lot more > pixel to draw, and more things to put in memory, so it's slower. > > Nothing but normal. If you have a "stink-normal AMD-32 bit system" it means > you have an *old* system. KDE 4 won't turn it into a *new* system, and > actually everything you just did is stupid, because you are trying to use > features on your old system that have been developped for more powerful > systems. > > Keep KDE 3.x and use your higher resolution, that's it > > Thierry One of the user in our community once told me the same thing. He did not turn on any animation or desktop effect, and used the same resolution as in KDE3. He found that KDE4 was *actually* slower than KDE3. For me it is also a true statement. Especially in an old system which KDE3 could run smoothly, KDE4 would be a lot slower. It's luck that my boss agreed to let me change my daily work PC to a dual core Intel and with 1GB memory, and now the speed of KDE4 is OK to me, although animation is still not very smooth. I'm just wondering why KDE4 is slower than KDE3. I guess that KDE4 may need more effort to fine tune its performance, since it changed a lot due to changing the whole framework. Anyway, I'm in love with KDE 4.1, and I appreciate the developers a lot. Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
