Re: [OT]Re: how to edit id3 tags in KDE?

[Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> [snip] JPEG2000 is noticeably better because it will 
> do lossless compression and doesn't have the block artifacts, yet the 
> market has standardized on the old and obsolete standard causing real 
> problems with digital cameras.

Not for *me* it doesn't :-D. I shot maybe a dozen pictures before 
turning on lossless-compressed raw (which I realize now was a mistake, 
turning on raw should have been the very first thing I did). Forget the 
compression format, anyone not shooting raw is likely already losing 
almost half the image quality to the camera's built-in tone mapping.

(Actually, I suppose if I fiddled with it, I could get better jpg's, but 
why bother when rawstudio can produce so much better results by throwing 
a general-purpose CPU at the problem?)

-- 
Matthew
ENOWIT: .sig file for this machine not set up yet

___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.