On Saturday 23 August 2008 19:15:50 Kishore wrote: > On Saturday 23 Aug 2008 11:32:59 pm landon kelsey wrote: > > I think I'll just wait for 4.2...thanks! > > Ultimately, the choice is yours but personally i would recommend that you > try 4.1. It is very usable IMHO. Anyone here can tell how f9 can be > upgraded to 4.1 instead of the 4.0.5 that landon currently uses? Fedora's 4.1 is on the test list, but since that is well-advanced inn F10 work, I wouldn't recommend getting it from there unless you are quite experienced. 4.1 should have been on the mainstream mirrors by now, but the RH/Fedora compromise problems have delayed it. I'd say 'hang on for a few days' and the packages should then be available on the Fedora mirrors. I know they were on the point of releasing them when all this happened. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
