On Saturday 14 June 2008 17:26:17 John wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2008 17:17:36 ziklag wrote:
> > I wrote a long nasty letter about how bad KDE4 was, but then it got back
> > at me by deleting my letter. What was that? Yet ANOTHER KDE bug?
> > How could that be? KDE4 is ALPHA quality at best. FC9? Who's running
> > the insane asylum? So many bugs, so few excuses....
> >
> > I'm off to try to track down that temp file that contained my original
> > post. Maybe I'll find it after work today and will ATTEMPT to post it
> > again.
> >
> > Linux really seems to be for L(users) if FC9/KDE4 is the latest and
> > greatest.
> >
> > ziklag@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Rather than slate it you should realise that it's very beta at the moment.
> It will be a lot less so when 4.1 final is released. This the way that KDE
> goes. They need users and bug reports to fix it. Unlike windows they don't
> have heaven knows how many people looking at and testing code.
>
> If you want to use KDE and don't want the possibility of significant bugs
> you should be using 3.5.7 and not 64bit either.
>
You should also remember that Fedora is, by its very nature, bleeding-edge.
No excuses are needed for what they did. They gave ample warning of the
situation. Maybe you didn't bother to read before installing?
Anne
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
