Hi KDE users,
I'm not sure where I should ask this, but at least it's
related to KDE. . . .
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux (testing distribution), where
the main KDE package (named "kde") depends on many KDE
subcomponents such as "kde-amusuments", which in turn
depends on many subsubcomponents such as "kdeedu" (educational
subsubcomponent), which in turn depends on many subsubsubcompoents
such as "blinken" (an educational game). Now, when I try to
remove "blinken", say, the package management system complains
that the package "kdeedu" would have an un-met dependency so that
I should also remove "kdeedu". Well, why not, I don't need the
educational packages. So, I try to remove the "kdeedu" package,
and then the system complains that I should remove "kde-amusuments",
too. And so on.
Do I need to delete the whole KDE system just to delete a game
("blinken" in this case)? Why is KDE packaged like this?
Why isn't subcomponents optional? In contrast, emacs, say,
has a lot of plugins, many of which are optional, meaning that
you can install a plugin separately and then emacs automatically
picks it up.
By the way, why do I need to remove KDE subcomponents? Because
I'd like to minimize my system-disk size. I back up the system
directories (root, /usr, /etc, and so on) plus my home directory
on to a second harddrive, which is nearly full because it is smaller
than the total disk capacity of the drives to be backed up. That
means, I can back up more of my stuff if I reduce the size
of /usr and so on.
Regards,
Ryo
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
