Re: Why GTK+ will prevail, and what needs to be done

[andrew kar <akar3d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 20:45 -0500, Taylor Byrnes wrote:
> I hope you all have enjoyed reading my explanation, I'd love to hear
> some thoughts.
> 

Actually I just had another thought on this; Isn't Gtk just a C toolkit
and not an OO C++ kit like qt?
If so and I think that is the case wouldn't it be at least an order of
magnitude harder to port from an Object-Oriented C++ toolkit to a non OO
C kit than to annother OO C++ toolkit like qt?  It seems to me that you
would have to start almost from scratch. 

___________________________________________________
.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.