On Friday 11 June 2004 08.03, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 11 June 2004 01:52, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
> > That mail is very broken. If you look at it you see that text message i
[..]
> How that explains that other MUAs handle that mail fine?
No, it doesn't. I was to quick to draw the conclusion that this was the
original. @_@
> I tend to think that KMail somehow mangled the message.
> This really can be a KMail bug. However, unless original reporter
> takes some measures to investigate the matter, I don't
> think it can be known for sure.
I agree.
>
> tcpdump -nli<eth> -s0 -xX port 110
>
> will be interesting to see, at least.
Although I usally use ethereal to sniff, or in some cases dump the traffic
with tcpdump -i eth0 -w dumpfilename -s0 and later view the traffic in
ethereal. Then the pop session can be viewed in clear text by right clicking
on a pop session packet and selecting "Follow tcp stream".
Another is to just telnet the server on port 110 and enter the commands
necessary.
telnet mailserver 110
user <username>
pass <password>
list
retr <number>
-- robin
___________________________________________________
.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
