On Thursday 22 April 2004 03:53 pm, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Thursday 22 April 2004 21:24, Jim Durham wrote: > > On Thursday 22 April 2004 02:41 pm, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On Thursday 22 April 2004 20:28, Jim Durham wrote: > > > > What's the correct way to do this? > > > > > > Don't hack the port Makefiles, just make -DWANT_KDE_DEBUG (or define > > > WANT_KDE_DEBUG in /etc/make.conf). > > > > Thanks very much... > > > > Something else I should have asked... when you type 'make clean' then > > 'make' it unpacks the sources again, overwriting any changes . > > Actually, the 'make clean' deletes the work/ subdirectory, so if you do > that, 'make' has to extract the distfile again. > > > I have been > > letting it get to the configure script conclusion, then control C 'ing it > > and changing the source. What is the proper way to do this? > > I'm not sure what you're asking. If you don't want to break with ctrl-c, do > 'make configure' - this will stop after the configure step and lets you > change things, then go on with 'make'. If you want your changes preserved > and automatically applied before each build, turn them into a > patch-<somename> file in a files subdirectory in the port directory (look > at other patches in other ports for examples). There appears to be a problem with the debug code. After compiling the same code with the _DWITH_KDE_DEBUG argument, I can't even get kdm to run. It crashes immediately and cycles up and down. Same code without the argument works. -Jim ___________________________________________________ . Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.