Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring/rsrc: declare io_find_buf_node() in header file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/1/25 02:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/28/25 7:04 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 5:45 PM Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3/1/25 00:16, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
Declare io_find_buf_node() in io_uring/rsrc.h so it can be called from
other files.

Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   io_uring/rsrc.c | 4 ++--
   io_uring/rsrc.h | 2 ++
   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
index 45bfb37bca1e..4c4f57cd77f9 100644
--- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
+++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
@@ -1066,12 +1066,12 @@ static int io_import_fixed(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
       }

       return 0;
   }

-static inline struct io_rsrc_node *io_find_buf_node(struct io_kiocb *req,
-                                                 unsigned issue_flags)

That's a hot path, an extra function call wouldn't be great,
and it's an internal detail as well. Let's better see what we
can do with the nop situation.

I can add back inline. With that, there shouldn't be any difference to
the generated instructions for io_import_reg_buf().

Yeah, in general I don't like manual inlines, unless it's been proven
that the compiler messes it up for some reason. If it's short enough
it'll be inlined.

It will _not_ be inlined in this case.

--
Pavel Begunkov





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux