Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rsrc: use rq_data_dir() to compute bvec dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 5:23 PM Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/25 22:30, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> > The macro rq_data_dir() already computes a request's data direction.
> > Use it in place of the if-else to set imu->dir.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   io_uring/rsrc.c | 6 +-----
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> > index 45bfb37bca1e..3107a03d56b8 100644
> > --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
> > +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> > @@ -957,15 +957,11 @@ int io_buffer_register_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
> >       imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
> >       refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
> >       imu->release = release;
> >       imu->priv = rq;
> >       imu->is_kbuf = true;
> > -
> > -     if (op_is_write(req_op(rq)))
> > -             imu->dir = IO_IMU_SOURCE;
> > -     else
> > -             imu->dir = IO_IMU_DEST;
> > +     imu->dir = 1 << rq_data_dir(rq);
>
> rq_data_dir returns READ/WRITE, which should be fine, but it'd
> be nicer to be more explicit unless it's already enforced
> somewhere else
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(WRITE ==  ITER_SOURCE);
> ditto for READ

The definitions of ITER_SOURCE and ITER_DEST seem pretty clear that
they are aliases for WRITE/READ:
#define ITER_SOURCE 1 // == WRITE
#define ITER_DEST 0 // == READ

So I assume other code is already relying on this equivalence.

Best,
Caleb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux