On 2/26/25 12:43 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Ignore this one, that was bogus. Trying to understand a crash in here. Just to wrap this up, it's the combining of table and cache that's the issue. The table can get torn down and freed while nodes are still alive - which is fine, but not with this change, as there's then no way to sanely put the cached entry. -- Jens Axboe
