On 2/24/25 12:10 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 2/24/25 17:55, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 2/24/25 10:53 AM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 9:44?AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/24/25 10:23 AM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: >>>>> io_is_compat() is already defined to return false if CONFIG_COMPAT is >>>>> disabled. So remove the additional #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT guards. Let the >>>>> compiler optimize out the dead code when CONFIG_COMPAT is disabled. >>>> >>>> Would you mind if I fold this into Pavel's patch? I can keep it >>>> standalone too, just let me know. >>> >>> Fine by me, though I thought Pavel was suggesting keeping it separate: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/da109d01-7aab-4205-bbb1-f5f1387f1847@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u >> >> I'm reading it as he has other stuff that will go on top. I don't see >> any reason to double stage this part, might as well remove the >> CONFIG dependency at the same time, if it's doable. >> >> Pavel? > > I'm not sure why you'd want that, but I don't mind Just because it imho should've been in the initial commit, so I'd consider it more of a fixup commit. But if you're fine with it, I'll fold it in with a note. -- Jens Axboe
