On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Jan 27, 2025 Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It is desirable to allow LSM to configure accessibility to io_uring > > because it is a coarse yet very simple way to restrict access to it. So, > > add an LSM for io_uring_allowed() to guard access to io_uring. > > > > Cc: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 + > > include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++ > > io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +- > > security/security.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > security/selinux/include/classmap.h | 2 +- > > 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Thanks Hamza, this looks good to me, but we need to wait until we get an > ACK from Jens on path 1/2; he's pretty responsive so I don't think we'll > have to wait too long. > > As far as the return/label issue in patch 1/2, as long as there are no > other issues, and you are okay with the change, I can fix that up when > merging your patches. Ya, that sounds good to me, thanks! > > -- > paul-moore.com
