Re: [PATCH v9 10/17] fuse: Add io-uring sqe commit and fetch support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/17/25 12:18, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 1/7/25 00:25, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> This adds support for fuse request completion through ring SQEs
>> (FUSE_URING_CMD_COMMIT_AND_FETCH handling). After committing
>> the ring entry it becomes available for new fuse requests.
>> Handling of requests through the ring (SQE/CQE handling)
>> is complete now.
>>
>> Fuse request data are copied through the mmaped ring buffer,
>> there is no support for any zero copy yet.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx> # io_uring
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   fs/fuse/dev_uring.c   | 450 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++
>>   fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h |  12 ++
>>   fs/fuse/fuse_i.h      |   4 +
>>   3 files changed, 466 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
>> index
>> b44ba4033615e01041313c040035b6da6af0ee17..f44e66a7ea577390da87e9ac7d118a9416898c28 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,19 @@ bool fuse_uring_enabled(void)
> ...
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Write data to the ring buffer and send the request to userspace,
>> + * userspace will read it
>> + * This is comparable with classical read(/dev/fuse)
>> + */
>> +static int fuse_uring_send_next_to_ring(struct fuse_ring_ent *ring_ent,
>> +                    unsigned int issue_flags)
>> +{
>> +    int err = 0;
>> +    struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = ring_ent->queue;
>> +
>> +    err = fuse_uring_prepare_send(ring_ent);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        goto err;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock(&queue->lock);
>> +    ring_ent->state = FRRS_USERSPACE;
>> +    list_move(&ring_ent->list, &queue->ent_in_userspace);
>> +    spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
>> +
>> +    io_uring_cmd_done(ring_ent->cmd, 0, 0, issue_flags);
>> +    ring_ent->cmd = NULL;
> 
> I haven't checked if it races with some reallocation, but
> you might want to consider clearing it under the spin.
> 
> spin_lock(&queue->lock);
> ...
> cmd = ring_ent->cmd;
> ring_ent->cmd = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&queue->lock);
> 
> io_uring_cmd_done(cmd);
> 
> Can be done on top if even needed.


Yes, thanks for your review! That is what I actually have in the ddn
branch, when I found the startup race.


Thanks,
Bernd






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux