Re: futex+io_uring: futex_q::task can maybe be dangling (but is not actually accessed, so it's fine)

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 15 2025 at 08:32, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Here's the raw patch. Should've done this initially rather than just
> tackle __futex_queue(), for some reason I thought/assumed that
> futex_queue() was more widely used.

'git grep' is pretty useful to validate such assumptions :)

> What do you think?

Looks about right.

Thanks,

        tglx