RE: [PATCH] io_uring: simplify the SQPOLL thread check when cancelling requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 10:34 PM
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@xxxxxxxxx>; Jens Axboe
> <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>; Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>; io-
> uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> syzbot+3c750be01dab672c513d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lizetao
> <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: simplify the SQPOLL thread check when cancelling
> requests
> 
> In io_uring_try_cancel_requests, we check whether sq_data->thread ==
> current to determine if the function is called by the SQPOLL thread to do iopoll
> when IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is set. This check can race with the SQPOLL
> thread termination.
> 
> io_uring_cancel_generic is used in 2 places: io_uring_cancel_generic and
> io_ring_exit_work. In io_uring_cancel_generic, we have the information
> whether the current is SQPOLL thread already. In io_ring_exit_work, in case
> the SQPOLL thread reaches this path, we don't need to iopoll and leave that for
> io_uring_cancel_generic to handle.
> 
> So to avoid the racy check, this commit adds a boolean flag to
> io_uring_try_cancel_requests to determine if we need to do iopoll inside the
> function and only sets this flag in io_uring_cancel_generic when the current is
> SQPOLL thread.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+3c750be01dab672c513d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  io_uring/io_uring.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index
> ff691f37462c..f28ea1254143 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ struct io_defer_entry {
> 
>  static bool io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>  					 struct io_uring_task *tctx,
> -					 bool cancel_all);
> +					 bool cancel_all,
> +					 bool force_iopoll);
> 
>  static void io_queue_sqe(struct io_kiocb *req);
> 
> @@ -2898,7 +2899,12 @@ static __cold void io_ring_exit_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
>  		if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)
>  			io_move_task_work_from_local(ctx);
> 
> -		while (io_uring_try_cancel_requests(ctx, NULL, true))
> +		/*
> +		 * Even if SQPOLL thread reaches this path, don't force
> +		 * iopoll here, let the io_uring_cancel_generic handle
> +		 * it.
> +		 */
> +		while (io_uring_try_cancel_requests(ctx, NULL, true, false))
>  			cond_resched();
> 
>  		if (ctx->sq_data) {
> @@ -3066,7 +3072,8 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_iowq(struct
> io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> 
>  static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>  						struct io_uring_task *tctx,
> -						bool cancel_all)
> +						bool cancel_all,
> +						bool force_iopoll)
>  {
>  	struct io_task_cancel cancel = { .tctx = tctx, .all = cancel_all, };
>  	enum io_wq_cancel cret;
> @@ -3096,7 +3103,7 @@ static __cold bool
> io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> 
>  	/* SQPOLL thread does its own polling */
>  	if ((!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) && cancel_all) ||
> -	    (ctx->sq_data && ctx->sq_data->thread == current)) {
> +	    force_iopoll) {
>  		while (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
>  			io_iopoll_try_reap_events(ctx);
>  			ret = true;
> @@ -3169,13 +3176,15 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool
> cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
>  					continue;
>  				loop |= io_uring_try_cancel_requests(node-
> >ctx,
>  							current->io_uring,
> -							cancel_all);
> +							cancel_all,
> +							false);
>  			}
>  		} else {
>  			list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list)
>  				loop |= io_uring_try_cancel_requests(ctx,
>  								     current-
> >io_uring,
> -								     cancel_all);
> +								     cancel_all,
> +								     true);
>  		}
> 
>  		if (loop) {
> --
> 2.43.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Li Zetao<lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
Li Zetao





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux