Re: [PATCH net-next v9 05/20] net: page_pool: add mp op for netlink reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 4:38 PM David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a mandatory memory provider callback that prints information about
> the provider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Seems like a straightforward refactor to add the op that Jakub requested:

Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  include/net/page_pool/types.h | 1 +
>  net/core/devmem.c             | 9 +++++++++
>  net/core/page_pool_user.c     | 3 +--
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> index d6241e8a5106..a473ea0c48c4 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct memory_provider_ops {
>         bool (*release_netmem)(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem);
>         int (*init)(struct page_pool *pool);
>         void (*destroy)(struct page_pool *pool);
> +       int (*nl_report)(const struct page_pool *pool, struct sk_buff *rsp);
>  };
>
>  struct pp_memory_provider_params {
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
> index 48903b7ab215..df51a6c312db 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.c
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.c
> @@ -394,9 +394,18 @@ bool mp_dmabuf_devmem_release_page(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem)
>         return false;
>  }
>
> +static int mp_dmabuf_devmem_nl_report(const struct page_pool *pool,
> +                                     struct sk_buff *rsp)
> +{
> +       const struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding = pool->mp_priv;
> +
> +       return nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_PAGE_POOL_DMABUF, binding->id);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct memory_provider_ops dmabuf_devmem_ops = {
>         .init                   = mp_dmabuf_devmem_init,
>         .destroy                = mp_dmabuf_devmem_destroy,
>         .alloc_netmems          = mp_dmabuf_devmem_alloc_netmems,
>         .release_netmem         = mp_dmabuf_devmem_release_page,
> +       .nl_report              = mp_dmabuf_devmem_nl_report,
>  };
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool_user.c b/net/core/page_pool_user.c
> index 8d31c71bea1a..61212f388bc8 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool_user.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool_user.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static int
>  page_pool_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *rsp, const struct page_pool *pool,
>                   const struct genl_info *info)
>  {
> -       struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding = pool->mp_priv;
>         size_t inflight, refsz;
>         void *hdr;
>
> @@ -244,7 +243,7 @@ page_pool_nl_fill(struct sk_buff *rsp, const struct page_pool *pool,
>                          pool->user.detach_time))
>                 goto err_cancel;
>
> -       if (binding && nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_PAGE_POOL_DMABUF, binding->id))
> +       if (pool->mp_ops && pool->mp_ops->nl_report(pool, rsp))
>                 goto err_cancel;
>

I thought maybe you should check nl_report exists here so that we
don't crash if we accidentally merge a memory provider that doesn't
define this, but the commit message says it's mandatory and we don't
check the existence of the other ops anyway, so this is probably fine.


-- 
Thanks,
Mina





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux