Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/16] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/3/24 15:24, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 11/27/24 13:40, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> [I removed RFC status as the design should be in place now
>> and as xfstests pass. I still reviewing patches myself, though
>> and also repeatings tests with different queue sizes.]
> 
> I left a few comments, but it looks sane. At least on the io_uring
> side nothing weird caught my eye. Cancellations might be a bit
> worrisome as usual, so would be nice to give it a good run with
> sanitizers.

Thanks a lot for your reviews, new series is in preparation, will 
send it out tomorrow to give a test run over night. I'm 
running xfstests on a kernel that has lockdep and ASAN enabled, which
is why it takes around 15 hours (with/without FOPEN_DIRECT_IO).

And definitely, cancellation/teardown is the part that I spent most
time on.


Thanks,
Bernd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux