Re: [PATCH RFC v7 14/16] fuse: {uring} Handle IO_URING_F_TASK_DEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/27/24 13:40, Bernd Schubert wrote:
The ring task is terminating, it not safe to still access
its resources. Also no need for further actions.

Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
---
  fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 10 ++++++++--
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
index 66addb5d00c36d84a0d8d1f470f5ae10d8ee3f6f..94dc3f56d4ab604eb4b87d3b9731567e3a214b0a 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
@@ -1056,16 +1056,22 @@ fuse_uring_send_req_in_task(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(pdu) > sizeof(cmd->pdu)); + if (unlikely(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_TASK_DEAD)) {
+		err = -ECANCELED;
+		goto terminating;
+	}

Can you just fix up the patch that added the function? Patch 11, I
assume. No need to keep a bug for a couple of commits when you can
avoid introducing it in the first place.

--
Pavel Begunkov





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux