On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:23 AM Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 22/11/24 04:30, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Do we really need to continue supporting nommu machines ? Is anyone
> > but me even boot testing those ?
>
> Yes. Across many architectures. And yes on every release, and for m68k building
> and testing on every rc for nommu at a minimum.
>
> I rarely hit build or testing problems on nonmmu targets. At least every kernel
> release I build and test armnommu (including thumb2 on cortex), m68k, RISC-V and
> xtensa. They are all easy, qemu targets for them all. Thats just me. So I would
> guess there are others building and testing too.
FTR, I do regular boot tests on K210 (SiPEED MAiX BiT RISC-V nommu).
Getting harder, as 8 MiB of RAM is not much...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
