On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:56:14 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > But I've been bringing this up a lot in the past (and offering > alternatives that don't introduce this overloading) and I think this > conversation has run its course. I'm unsure about this approach and > this could use another pair of eyes. Jakub, sorry to bother you but > you probably are the one that reviewed the whole net_iov stuff most > closely. Any chance you would take a look and provide direction here? > Maybe my concern is overblown... Sorry I haven't read this code very closely (still!?) really hoping for next version to come during the merge window when time is more abundant :S
