Re: [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: remove pointless addition in btrfs_encoded_read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/10/24 01:46, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 22/10/24 22:50, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>> iocb->ki_pos isn't used after this function, so there's no point in
>> changing its value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +----
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> index 7c5ef2c5c7e8..94098a4c782d 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> @@ -9252,7 +9252,7 @@ ssize_t btrfs_encoded_read(struct kiocb *iocb, 
>> struct iov_iter *iter,
>>           ret = btrfs_encoded_read_inline(iocb, iter, start, lockend,
>>                           &cached_state, extent_start,
>>                           count, encoded, &unlocked);
>> -        goto out;
>> +        goto out_em;
> 
> 
> Proceed to out_unlock_extent; free_extent_map() has already been called
> two lines above, and %em is now NULL.
> 
> Thanks, Anand
> 

Thanks Anand, I'll send a patch for this.

Mark





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux