On 10/24/24 19:00, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/24/24 11:56 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 10/24/24 18:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/24/24 10:06 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
On 10/24/24 16:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
...>>>> Seems like you're agreeing but then stating the opposite, there
is some confusion. I'm saying that IMHO the right API wise way
is resolving an imu at issue time, just like it's done for fixed
files, and what your recent series did for send zc.
Yeah early morning confusion I guess. And I do agree in principle,
though for registered buffers, those have to be registered upfront
anyway, so no confusion possible with prep vs issue there. For provided
buffers, it only matters for the legacy ones, which generally should not
be used. Doesn't change the fact that you're technically correct, the
right time to resolve them would be at issue time.
I'm talking about sendmsg with iovec. Registered buffers should
be registered upfront, that's right, but iovec should be copied
at prep, and finally resolved into bvecs incl the imu/buffer lookup
at the issue time. And those are two different points in time,
maybe because of links, draining or anything else. And if they
should be at different moments, there is no way to do it while
copying iovec.
Oh I totally follow, the incremental approach would only work if it can
be done at prep time. If at issue time, then it has to turn an existing
iovec array into the appropriate bvec array. And that's where you'd have
to do some clever bits to avoid holding both a full bvec and iovec array
in memory, which would be pretty wasteful/inefficient. If done at issue
Why would it be wasteful and inefficient? No more than jumping
though that incremental infra for each chunk, doubling the size
of the array / reallocating / memcpy'ing it, instead of a tight
loop doing the entire conversion.
time, then there's no way around a second iteration :/
--
Pavel Begunkov
