Re: [PATCH v1 12/15] io_uring/zcrx: add io_recvzc request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/9/24 20:42, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/9/24 1:27 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
+    /* All data completions are posted as aux CQEs. */
+    req->flags |= REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT;

This puzzles me a bit...

Well, it's a multishot request. And that flag protects from cq
locking rules violations, i.e. avoiding multishot reqs from
posting from io-wq.

Maybe make it more like the others and require that
IORING_RECV_MULTISHOT is set then, and set it based on that?

if (IORING_RECV_MULTISHOT)
     return -EINVAL;
req->flags |= REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT;

It can be this if that's the preference. It's a bit more consistent,
but might be harder to use. Though I can just hide the flag behind
liburing helpers, would spare from neverending GH issues asking
why it's -EINVAL'ed

Maybe I'm missing something, but why not make it:

/* multishot required */
if (!(flags & IORING_RECV_MULTISHOT))
	return -EINVAL;
req->flags |= REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT;

Right, that's what I meant before spewing a non sensible snippet.

and yeah just put it in the io_uring_prep_recv_zc() or whatever helper.
That would seem to be a lot more consistent with other users, no?

--
Pavel Begunkov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux