Re: [PATCH liburing] sanitize: add ifdef guard around sanitizer functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/2/24 6:02 PM, David Wei wrote:
> Otherwise there are redefinition errors during compilation if
> CONFIG_USE_SANITIZER isn't set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/sanitize.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/sanitize.c b/src/sanitize.c
> index 46391a6..db5930d 100644
> --- a/src/sanitize.c
> +++ b/src/sanitize.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static inline void initialize_sanitize_handlers()
>  	sanitize_handlers_initialized = true;
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_USE_SANITIZER)
>  void liburing_sanitize_ring(struct io_uring *ring)
>  {
>  	struct io_uring_sq *sq = &ring->sq;
> @@ -174,3 +175,4 @@ void liburing_sanitize_iovecs(const struct iovec *iovecs, unsigned nr)
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> +#endif

Hmm, but src/sanitize.o should not be built unless that is set. How is
this happening?

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux