On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:49:26AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:23:43AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > I think because he's getting conflicting feedback. The arguments against > > it being that it's not a good match, however it's the same match created > > for streams, and no one complained then, and it's an existing user ABI. > > People complained, and the streams code got removed pretty quickly > because it did not work as expected. I don't think that counts as > a big success. I don't think the kernel API was the problem. Capable devices never materialized, so the code wasn't doing anything useful.
